Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
SXT-172 by TheXHS SXT-172 by TheXHS
The SXT-172 is a interplanetary cargo spacecraft. This one can not land on the planet's surface, just beyond the orbit. For the descent to the surface used shuttle for containers with cargo and crew, shuttle also living compartment during interplanetary flight. For interplanetary travel used nuclear rocket engines.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconabyssaldaemon:
AbyssalDaemon Featured By Owner Feb 27, 2014
This is awesome.
Reply
:iconquanscouts15:
Quanscouts15 Featured By Owner Nov 18, 2013
Looks like something from Kirbal Space Program
Reply
:iconmrwonderworks:
MrWonderWorks Featured By Owner Oct 28, 2013  Hobbyist Writer
I Like That Ship!
Reply
:iconjmozynski:
jmozynski Featured By Owner Sep 8, 2013
nice like the design
Reply
:iconsecolin:
Secolin Featured By Owner Jul 3, 2012
Great !!!!!!!
Reply
:iconsecolin:
Secolin Featured By Owner Jul 3, 2012
Cool !!!!!!!!
Reply
:iconhotwaxonlobsters:
hotwaxonlobsters Featured By Owner Sep 1, 2011
I love how real it looks. Like something we'd really build within the next fifty years.
Reply
:iconihabi:
ihabi Featured By Owner Jul 16, 2011  Hobbyist
Супер! Чем лучше прорисованная работа, тем охотнее её перерисовать !!
Reply
:iconslowdog294:
slowdog294 Featured By Owner Apr 11, 2011  Professional General Artist
WOW.
Reply
:iconbagera3005:
bagera3005 Featured By Owner Apr 4, 2011  Professional Interface Designer
bad thing with shuttle you need ready landing area
Reply
:iconmiklosgo:
miklosgo Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Nice design and beautiful colors, I like it, nice work.
Reply
:iconedxcal:
EdXCal Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2011
If I might make a suggestion, I often go for realistic spacecraft and this isn't bad at all only it's lacking enough reaction mass (Fuel). I'd suggest adding long tanks on either side of the cargo area. Also, the cargo moduals, maybe make them the same size as the cargo bay on the shuttle so it's easy just to load into the shuttle and off ya go. :)
Reply
:iconthexhs:
TheXHS Featured By Owner Apr 3, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
If we use nuclear rocket engine, we have greater momentum with less weight, thanks to higher speed of the exhaust.
I think that the amount of reaction mass can be reduced for close flight (originally scheduled to Earth-Mars). And in the case of long flights (for example Jupiter, Saturn), you can add more tanks - because we have modular design.
As for cargo modules - a true, or need bigger shuttle, or smaller containers, but this idea has already appeared when the picture was painted ...
Reply
:iconedxcal:
EdXCal Featured By Owner Apr 3, 2011
Well if your going nuclear, I'd suggest a gas core nuclear rocket, they'd have the highest temp/exhaust speeds. You'd likely want to shield your crew from ratiation as the echaust would be radioactive. :)
Reply
:iconbolo42:
Bolo42 Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
Or you could have a Bimodal NTR powering a VASMIR plasma engine
Reply
:iconedxcal:
EdXCal Featured By Owner Apr 5, 2011
Indeed. :)
Reply
:iconpaladin208:
paladin208 Featured By Owner Jun 5, 2013
what about project orion?
Reply
:iconchaosjames:
ChaosJames Featured By Owner Jul 16, 2013
orion requires absurdly large ships to be viable, this one is far to small
Reply
:iconroddy1990:
Roddy1990 Featured By Owner Apr 2, 2011
Holy shit, that is AWESOME! O.O
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×
  • Photo
Download JPG 1600 × 1200




Details

Submitted on
April 2, 2011
Image Size
1.2 MB
Resolution
1600×1200
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
3,751
Favourites
86 (who?)
Comments
19
Downloads
147
×