Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
XT-25 Horrendous in color by TheXHS XT-25 Horrendous in color by TheXHS
The XT-25 is a main battle tank. Armament - double-barreled main gun - 125 mm, coaxial triple gatling machine gun - 12,7 mm, double-barreled anti-aircraft machine gun 20 mm, anti-aircraft missile system - three rockets such as Stinger or "IGLA", and reconnaissance drone.
This picture is a repaint of this
Add a Comment:
Kassandrago Featured By Owner Dec 7, 2014
башня мягко говоря перегружена. сдвоенная пушка, курсовой роторника, зенитная башенка со спаренной пушкой, ракеты (ПТУР/ЗНТ?), да ещё и БПЛА в корме... многовато будет.
TheXHS Featured By Owner Jan 7, 2015  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Хотелось всего и сразу, отринув всяческие претензии на реализм)))
mrhenrymason Featured By Owner Edited Jul 31, 2014
Hmm...double-barreled is so 1940s. It should be triple! Why is there no barrel on the hull facing the back so it can destroy enemies form behind? It needs also a 155mm howitzer for long range engagements.  And dont you forget the tactical nuke! I mean its basicaly standard for modern main battle tanks!
Birdhorse Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2015
You. I like you.
nordicberserk Featured By Owner May 26, 2014
I'm not sure I like this design. It looks ffreaking AWESOME, dont get me wrong. But I think it is trying to do too many things at once.
Double-barrel main gun; would need a hell of a lot of ammo storage. Same goes for the gatling co-axial.

The anti-aricraft turret; feasible, IF there is room for the ammo, and attacks from the air is that prevalent, and friendly aircover is lacking.

Missile system; Yup. This is a good idea. Perhaps with a multi-role missile in stead of anti-air only. Tanks/bunkers need taking out beyond main gun range? Use a missile.

The UAV; Nope. Unless you have a dedicated crewman controlling the thing, mounting something like that on a tank is pretty much useless.

There. I have iparted my armchair general knowledge (I.E. I have no hands on knowledge about tanks). It looks F**KING awesome! It just isnt feasible. At leasst not today.
Hellomon100 Featured By Owner Aug 10, 2014
UAV is no problem the size of the tank merits it's operation the AA Missiles although is in need of a Ammo carrier.
AzraakVrakhai Featured By Owner Apr 17, 2014
Masterpiece! Russia should have weaponry like this in real.
Cialmci Featured By Owner Jan 8, 2014  Student Digital Artist
any tips for drawing tanks? Fairly new to the drawing field!
Warhammer9 Featured By Owner Nov 18, 2013
Wow,I'm speachless,looks amazing
Quesocito Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
cool man
The-Nezumi Featured By Owner Mar 27, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
All it needs now is a hull mounted mortar peering out next to the drivers compartment.
parakitteh Featured By Owner Mar 27, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I'd also hate to have to point this out, but some of the parts of this tank are highly impractical. Twin-gun tanks don't work well, a gatling-type weapon is just not necessary and the box launcher is vulnerable, though that one's probably nothing more than a niggle. Many modern Gun-Launched Anti-Tank Guided Missiles are capable of engaging low-flying aircraft.
MisterArtMaster101 Featured By Owner Feb 6, 2013
Agreed. Then again I'm the guy who thought up a 175 ton tank that is the MBT of a fic because speed doesn't cut as a defense mechanism anymore. It only has a 150mm coilgun, a duo of 12.7mm machineguns, a 12.7mm plasma pulse gun for active defense, and a secondary UVB-FEL cannon.
parakitteh Featured By Owner Mar 27, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
This actually looks really cool.
RedVolk Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2012
wow looks pretty cool, must have to carry a shite ton of ammo tho XD
Yumaboy1814 Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2012  Hobbyist
Thats badass
GrimSheeper Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2012
Looks like the additions would be a bit of a problem in Urban environments, but as an MBT this looks to be a real monster.
sadyVONschattig Featured By Owner Mar 26, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
that's....overpowered....therefore awesome
Dja-Dja Featured By Owner Jan 24, 2012
А если не секрет, объясните, зачем нужны те цепочки с грузиками сзади башни?
TheXHS Featured By Owner Jan 24, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
Решение слизано с израильских Меркав. Как я понимаю, цепочки защищают от кумулятивной боевой части - она сдетонирует не при контакте с броней, а раньше, при контакте с цепочкой. И брони достигнет уже изрядно рассевшаяся и ослабленная кумулятивная струя.
Да, википедия подтверждает:

В нижней части кормы башни танка Меркава Мк.2 по ее периметру подвешены металлические цепи с шариками. Они служат своего рода противокумулятивными экранами, предназначенными для уменьшения поражающего действия кумулятивных снарядов и ПТУР, так как боевые части последних срабатывают до встречи с основной броней танка.
Dja-Dja Featured By Owner Jan 25, 2012
А использовать не шарики никак нельзя?
TheXHS Featured By Owner Jan 30, 2012  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
ну любой иной формы утяжелители, чем шарики плохи?
Dja-Dja Featured By Owner Jan 31, 2012
Да нет, ничем не плохи, просто интересно было.
PS: по-моему в названии альбома "Google ScetchUp" допущена ошибка.
Damn-Yuki Featured By Owner Sep 17, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
I think I commented on the original drawing of this, but I've got some new stuff to say. :D

First off, I loved the design from the start, although I think that it should be called the "XT-25 Overkill". XD I also really like the coloring job that you did, the detail and shading are amazing! (especially considering all those reactive-armor panels that have so many facets to color in)

Lastly, I have a few questions:
1.) Is the twin 125mm cannon a Gast-gun design? (an autocannon design where the recoil from firing one barrel loads and charges the other, used on several Soviet aircraft cannons like the Gryazev-Shipunov GSh-23) I ask because it seems like it would be very impractical to have a twin-gun main armament without some kind of auto-loading system.
2.) What are those little balls on chains towards the rear of the turret?
3.) Is the AA turret a remotely-controlled turret, or is it more like a separate turret with a crew member inside?
4.) Are there any specifications for the armor, crew, weight, dimensions and performance?
5.) This one isn't really a question, but more of an idea: I think it might be a little more practical if the UAV-launcher was a feature limited to command tanks, or the lead tank of a tank platoon. It just seems (to me) like that would be closer to reality, since command tanks are usually fitted with much more elaborate communications gear than standard tanks.

Sorry that this is so long, but these designs just put me in a really inquisitive mood. In general, the more questions I have about a design, the more interesting it is to me and the more I like it. Since this comment is so long, you should take that to mean that I really, REALLY love this design!!! :headbang: :+fav:
CommanderWolffe Featured By Owner Aug 20, 2011
Don't you think that this tank design would be a bit... "Expensive" to produce in mass-quantities, and to be re-supplying for it to be a Main Battle Tank? It sould be classified as like, "Heavy Battle Tank", or something, referring to the amount of damage it could do on a battlefield, as this looks like it could do a FAIR amount of damage in the battlefield, but once again, looks a bit expesive to produce and resupply en masse.
Panzerfire Featured By Owner Aug 18, 2011  Hobbyist General Artist
LOL. that MBT has some name. :XD:
yanachka-werewolf Featured By Owner Aug 17, 2011
Ааа, суперский танк )) вот бы на таком заехать по нескольким адресам :nana:
I wouldn't say horrendous.
MrJumpManV4 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
A few placement issues but the concept is very very nice.
samsite-X Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Professional Digital Artist
GREAT concept! :D
DarkProxy Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Ergrassa Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Hobbyist Digital Artist
а зачем на нем БПЛА? или это не стандартная комплектация? =)
TheXHS Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Hobbyist Traditional Artist
В принципе нынче я согласен с вторым утверждением. Хотя год назад (а концепт еще 2010 года) хотелось "каждому танку по табельному БПЛА" (для решения проблемы с обзором в городе/горах/лесистой местности, не все же пустыни или Европейский ТВД), но нынче склонен считать что такая дура на башне не к добру. Так что пусть будет или специальной командирской машиной, или вообще опытным образцом.
Но идея "каждому танку по БПЛА" меня еще не оставила. Только облик БПЛА мне другим видится... Или что то такое круглое, маленькое, на одном вентиляторе с камерой... или более инфернальная конструкция, в габаритах танкового выстрела, с запуском через ствол.
JaredtheFox92 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Hobbyist Writer
Besides the UAV launcher I can actually see this being in the field! =)
rebel28 Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011  Student Digital Artist
You should get a book called 'Armoured Warfare' by Tom Clancy. Brilliant book, I've only read up to artillery.
unspacy Featured By Owner Aug 16, 2011
i agree with Armored Warfare
unspacy Featured By Owner Aug 17, 2011
а зачем на нем БПЛА? или это не стандартная комплектация

and why it UAVs? or it is not standard equipment?
why not that cool man :)
Add a Comment:
  • Photo
Download JPG 1600 × 1200


Submitted on
August 16, 2011
Image Size
962 KB


18,727 (12 today)
254 (who?)